Court Rules in Favor of Tennessee Walking Horse Industry on Key Issues
By WalkingHorseChat.com Staff
Friday, January 31, 2025
In a landmark decision that has sent ripples through the Tennessee Walking Horse community, United States District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ruled today in favor of the Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration, Tom Gould, and Kimberly Lewis in their legal challenge against the USDA’s controversial amendments to the Horse Protection Act (HPA). The ruling, which was met with widespread celebration among industry supporters, marks a significant victory for the Tennessee Walking Horse industry on nearly all counts, with the exception of the USDA’s provisions regarding the Designated Qualified Persons (DQP) program.
Judge Kacsmaryk’s ruling addressed several critical aspects of the USDA’s 2024 amendments, which had sparked intense debate and concern within the Walking Horse community. In his opinion, the judge stated:
“The Court HOLDS that: (1) USDA exceeded its statutory authority by promulgating a blanket prohibition on action devices, pads, and substances; (2) the DCIS provision replacing the Scar Rule fails to provide adequate due process; and (3) the lack of 
genuine pre- and post-deprivation review in the 2024 Rule fails to provide adequate due process. However, the 2024 Rule provision regarding the DQP program does not constitute an excess of statutory authority, arbitrary or capricious decision-making, or a violation of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.”
This decision effectively overturns key components of the USDA’s amendments, which many in the industry viewed as overly restrictive and detrimental to the future of the Tennessee Walking Horse. The ruling has been hailed as a triumph for horse enthusiasts, trainers, and breeders who have long argued that the USDA’s regulations were not only unnecessary but also harmful to the breed’s legacy and the industry’s economic viability.
Industry Leaders and Supporters React
Tommy Williams, publisher of WalkingHorseChat.com and a vocal advocate for the Tennessee Walking Horse industry, expressed his overwhelming support for the court’s decision. In an exclusive statement, Williams said:
“This ruling is a monumental win for the Tennessee Walking Horse industry and for everyone who loves and supports this incredible breed. Judge Kacsmaryk’s decision reaffirms what we’ve been saying all along—that the USDA’s overreach was not only unjustified but also a direct threat to the future of our industry. The court has recognized the importance of preserving our traditions while ensuring that due process is upheld. This is a victory for fairness, for the horses, and for the people who dedicate their lives to this sport.”
Williams went on to praise the efforts of Tom Gould, Kimberly Lewis, and the Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration for their unwavering commitment to defending the industry.
“Tom Gould and Kimberly Lewis have been tireless champions for the Walking Horse community, and their leadership in this case has been nothing short of extraordinary. This ruling wouldn’t have been possible without their determination and the support of countless individuals who believe in the future of our breed. Today, we celebrate not just a legal victory, but a reaffirmation of the values that make this industry so special.”
Key Takeaways from the Ruling
The court’s decision addressed several critical issues that have been at the heart of the debate surrounding the USDA’s amendments:
- Blanket Prohibition on Action Devices, Pads, and Substances
Judge Kacsmaryk ruled that the USDA exceeded its statutory authority by implementing a blanket ban on action devices, pads, and substances. This aspect of the ruling is particularly significant, as these tools have long been used in the training and presentation of Tennessee Walking Horses. The court’s decision ensures that these practices can continue, provided they are used responsibly and in compliance with existing regulations. - Due Process Concerns
The court found that the USDA’s replacement of the Scar Rule with the Digital Composite Image Scoring (DCIS) system failed to provide adequate due process. Additionally, the lack of pre- and post-deprivation review in the 2024 Rule was deemed insufficient to protect the rights of individuals within the industry. These findings underscore the importance of transparency and fairness in regulatory decision-making. - DQP Program Upheld
While the court ruled in favor of the industry on nearly all counts, it upheld the USDA’s provisions regarding the DQP program. The DQP program, which designates qualified individuals to inspect horses for compliance with the HPA, was found to be within the USDA’s statutory authority and not arbitrary or capricious.
A Turning Point for the Industry
Today’s ruling represents a turning point for the Tennessee Walking Horse industry, which has faced significant challenges in recent years. The decision not only validates the concerns of industry stakeholders but also provides a path forward for the preservation and promotion of the breed.
As Tommy Williams noted, “This is more than just a legal victory—it’s a testament to the resilience and passion of the Walking Horse community. We’ve faced adversity before, and we’ve always come out stronger. Today’s ruling is a reminder that when we stand together, we can overcome even the greatest challenges.”
The Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration and its supporters are now looking ahead to the future with renewed optimism. With the court’s decision in hand, the industry is poised to continue its tradition of excellence while ensuring the welfare of the horses remains a top priority.
For more updates and analysis on this developing story, stay tuned to WalkingHorseChat.com, your trusted source for all things Tennessee Walking Horse.
Quotes from Tommy Williams, publisher of WalkingHorseChat.com, were included in this article with his permission.
