The Board of Directors for FAST (Foundation for the Advancement & Support of the Tennessee Walking Show Horse) is pleased to announce that Mrs. Sarah Smith has been hired as the foundation’s Director of Events. In her capacity, Smith will be responsible for the Foundation’s signature events, a two-day Spring Showcase horse show in April, a summer fundraising event, the annual Celebration 50-50 raffle and the Fall one-day horse show in November.

FAST has been the leading organization in providing funding for the preservation and advancement of the show horse. Since its founding more than 10 years ago, the foundation has raised in excess of $3 million dollars to support research and development, scholarships, legal aid, marketing and promotion and horse show development. “The foundation is very pleased to welcome Sarah Smith as our Director of Events. Sarah’s personal knowledge and relationships within the industry and the middle Tennessee area will be an asset to our efforts to continue to grow the work of the foundation and consequently have the resources to be able to continue providing much needed support for the sustainability of our show horse,” said Dr. Kasey Kesselring, FAST Chairman.

TWHBEA reaction to NAS study
Thursday, January 28, 2021

The Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders’ and Exhibitors’ Association is pleased that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS) recently concluded their study entitled, “A Review of Methods for Detecting Soreness in Horses (2021)”, recently published. The study, for the first time combining efforts of the USDA and the Tennessee Walking Horse industry (Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders’ Foundation, the USDA, and the Tennessee Department of Agriculture), was commissioned to examine methods and approaches for detecting soring of horses and to improve the reliability of inspections and conclusions related to soreness and soring.

The Horse Protection Act is a commerce law governing the showing, auctioning, and exhibiting of horses that outlaws soring, defined as an action by a person that results in physical pain to the horse. Soring is further defined as possibly including irritating or blistering agents, burns, cuts or lacerations, or use of any tack, nail, screw, or chemical agent used to irritate or cause pain to the limb of a horse. (Ref. 15 US Code Section 1821, Section 3).

A variety of experienced and well-respected veterinarians with private and university affiliations conducted the study and considered testimony and materials over a two year period to prepare their findings in the report overseen by doctors from Michigan State University and Washington University (St. Louis).

The NAS committee first acknowledged the stamina, gait, even disposition and unique smooth four-beat running walk and popularity of competing Tennessee Walking Horses, and then turned to their findings.

NAS found as a result of the study (and the Walking Horse industry and USDA appear to agree), that the inspection system and methods involving Tennessee Walking horses are inadequate and need to be improved through objective tests and methods.

NAS was charged to explore new methods and approaches and technology involving inspections, with the goals of consistency, objectivity, quality and reliability. Their guiding principle was consistent with ours – the welfare of the Tennessee Walking Horse.

We agree with NAS findings that there has been great variability and discrepancy in inspections; experience and training vary greatly in inspectors; and inspectors may have real or perceived conflicts of interest. The study found that this results in lack of valid and reliable methods of inspection and fails to meet the goals of consistency, objectivity, quality and reliability.

Even though “new methods, approaches and technology” will require further research and development, NAS suggests that only “highly trained and experienced equine veterinarians” would or should be examining horses, and any person not an experienced equine veterinarian should not be doing the inspections. That is a definite step in the right direction, and we look forward to the use of certified equine vets stepping into this role; but we must continue to call out for, and find, better and more objective testing, as some have voiced that this recommendation to use only qualified, experienced equine veterinarians will be difficult and carries costs, and veterinarian opinions will vary between veterinarians and remain subjective, thereby impeding consistency, objectivity, quality and reliability.

Although the NAS study discounts the need or desire to have a second opinion that results in consistent findings before disqualifying a horse, we believe that insuring consistency and reliability in inspections is always to the benefit of the horse, the exhibitor, the trainer, and the owner.

NAS suggests that one method of obtaining objectivity, consistency, quality and reliability is the use of blood testing and swabbing to test for chemical and/or drug applications. We agree with NAS findings that such testing is certainly desirable when done under appropriate circumstances and using methods that insure reliability.

NAS also examined the so-called “scar rule”. They found that the rule, as written, and considering past interpretation and use, has been inconsistent and that “the rule is unenforceable”. If it is to continue, it must be reexamined and rewritten. They agree that, even if scarring is found, the cause of an established scar (not an active or raw lesion) will not necessarily be clear, and the presence of an existing scar would not, in itself, necessarily be a source of soreness in the animal as presented. They recommend a revision of the rule and certain findings as necessary to enforce it. Of course, as it stands, findings of redness, swelling, or an active lesion or raw spot would disqualify a horse from showing; and we can call for future considerations to explore how an old scar that may not contribute in any way to soring or reaction of pain in the animal at the time of exhibition or training, would be viewed.

We appreciate and applaud the efforts of the USDA, the Tennessee Walking Horse Foundation, and the Tennessee Department of Agriculture, along with the equine veterinarians and scientists that participated, as well as those that testified and supplied materials for the study.

In summary, this combined effort concludes in findings that current inspection practices and methods are inadequate, makes suggestions for improvements that must be made, and in the agreement that we must continue to search for quality objective methods, approaches and technology that result in findings that are consistent and reliable.

Although the Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders’ and Exhibitors’ Association is not in the business of inspecting horses, we look forward to HIOs joining in exploring and establishing objective tests that meet the standards suggested and result in predictable, consistent, and verifiable findings.

Copies of the full report are available from the National Acadamies Press, Washington, D.C.; http://www.nap.edu.
Submitted by Jim Heiting, Vice President, Equine Welfare

Equine Obituary – Jammin’ For Keeps
Friday, January 29, 2021

Reserve world champion Jammin’ For Keeps recently passed away at Cedar Tree Farms. Affectionately known as Jammin,’ the talented mare was sired by Cash For Keeps and out of Strawberry Jam. She found show ring success at young age and maintained that success for over a decade.

Under the direction of Chet Mills, Jammin’ would reach the pinnacle of her career claiming top honors at the prestigious Columbia Jubilee and the title of Reserve World Champion at the 2016 Celebration. With 17 blues and 20 reserve finishes, very few of her show ring peers could match her sustained success.

Not only was she successful in the show ring, she was also a producer of champions. Her first foal Walkin’ & Jammin’ inherited her mother’s striking good looks and used them to capture the titles of Futurity Champion, World Champion Weanling filly and Reserve World Grand Champion weanling. A working mom, Jammin’ took home honors at the same Celebration; leaving her filly’s side only long enough to compete herself.

A truly special animal. Jammin’ will not soon be forgotten by her fans and especially by those of at Cedar Tree Farms.

Its with great pride that our new site is loading as we speak with a focus on new and old and very old TWH video! This is what the public is looking for and we plan to deliver!

got to Video @ The Celebration

Lifetime Achievement Awards Highlight of Reno Exhibitors’ Party
Tuesday, November 28, 2000

Written by: Tommy Williams
email:tommywhc@aol.com
931-492-2825
WHC Publisher-Williams Media Entertainment

The exhibitors’ party in Reno was a memorable occasion, highlighted by the presentation of Lifetime Achievement Awards to three individuals who have made significant contributions to the West Coast walking horse industry. Each honoree was recognized for their decades of dedication and impact on the breed.

Eva McClure
Eva McClure was the first to be honored, and her surprise was evident as Russ Thompson took the stage to recount her remarkable journey. For over 40 years, Eva has been a pillar of the walking horse community, initially through her partnership with her late husband, Mitch McClure. Together, they were early exhibitors and breeders who played a crucial role in establishing the walking horse as a respected presence on the AHSA multi-breed show circuit. Today, Eva continues to oversee Courtesy Stables in Somis, California, maintaining the legacy she and Mitch built.

Paul Hughes
Next, Paul Hughes was recognized for his enduring influence on the breed. Bil Hartman shared a brief but impactful summary of Hughes’ contributions. After serving in the Navy, Hughes moved to Southern California over 50 years ago and established a training barn that became a cornerstone of the walking horse community. His mentorship helped launch the careers of notable trainers such as Frank White, Russ Thompson, and Scott Benham. Even today, Hughes remains an active promoter of the breed, introducing new enthusiasts and owners from his base at Golden West Farms in Ontario, California.

Bill Maurer
Finally, Bill Maurer’s contributions were celebrated. Maurer was a pioneer in managing Helene Kahn’s Merrywood Farm breeding operation and has been a long-standing local board member. His leadership in membership and sponsor committees has been vital to the success of local show activities. Although age has slowed him down, Maurer and his wife, Jeanette, remain dedicated to the breed, often visiting on Saturday mornings to watch their family’s horses train. His daughter, Harriet Cappuccio, accepted the award on his behalf, expressing heartfelt gratitude for the recognition.

The evening was a fitting tribute to these three individuals, whose passion and commitment have left an indelible mark on the walking horse industry. Their stories serve as an inspiration to all who continue to support and promote the breed.

**NHSC Develops Five-Year Operating Plan for Horse Protection Enforcement**

In a significant step toward advancing horse protection standards, the National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) is actively working to finalize a comprehensive five-year operating plan. This initiative, outlined in a letter from Craig Evans dated October 4, 2000, aims to enhance enforcement measures for horse protection during the 2001-2005 period.

The NHSC’s commitment to safeguarding equine welfare is evident in its proactive approach to planning. The letter emphasizes the importance of finalizing the operating plan ahead of the 2001 show season. This urgency stems from delays experienced during the previous year, which highlighted the need for a more structured and timely strategy.

The proposed plan is expected to address key issues surrounding horse protection enforcement, ensuring that regulations are applied consistently and effectively across all events. By establishing clear guidelines and operational protocols, the NHSC aims to foster greater accountability within the equestrian community while promoting ethical practices in horse shows.

Craig Evans’ communication underscores the NHSC’s dedication to prioritizing equine welfare and maintaining the integrity of competitive events. The five-year plan will serve as a roadmap for addressing challenges, streamlining enforcement processes, and building trust among stakeholders.

As the equestrian community prepares for the upcoming show season, the NHSC’s efforts to implement a forward-thinking and robust operating plan reflect its unwavering commitment to horse protection. By taking decisive steps now, the commission is setting a strong foundation for sustained progress in the years ahead.

**The Evolution of the USDA’s Horse Protection Operating Plans: A Timeline of Negotiations and Challenges**

The history of the USDA’s Horse Protection Operating Plans reveals a complex and often contentious negotiation process between the government and various Horse Industry Organizations (HIOs). From the initial draft of the 2000 Operating Plan to the eventual implementation of the 2001-2003 plan, this timeline highlights key developments, disputes, and resolutions that have shaped the enforcement of the Horse Protection Act (HPA).

### **1999: The Foundation is Laid**
In November 1999, the USDA released its first draft of the 2000 Operating Plan. However, resistance from HIOs quickly surfaced. On November 14, the National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) identified 50 major contentions with the draft and opted to maintain the 1999 plan. Subsequent meetings between the USDA and HIO representatives failed to bridge significant gaps, particularly regarding changes in regulatory approaches. By December, the USDA issued a revised draft incorporating some feedback, but HIOs remained divided over its adoption.

### **2000: A Year of Stalemates and Adjustments**
The year 2000 began with discord. The NHSC and several other HIOs refused to sign the new plan, citing concerns over changes in enforcement methods, such as relying solely on palpation to detect soreness in horses. USDA Deputy Administrator Dr. Ron DeHaven expressed disappointment but affirmed that USDA personnel would enforce the HPA at non-compliant events.

Throughout the year, negotiations continued in fits and starts. Multiple meetings, letters, and revisions failed to yield consensus. In March, DeHaven introduced an alternative plan, “2000-B,” identical to the 1999 plan but with added endnotes. However, these endnotes sparked further objections from HIOs, who argued they altered the plan’s interpretation and implementation.

By mid-year, congressional representatives became involved, with several senators and congressmen urging the USDA to revert to the 1999 plan’s framework. Despite these interventions, disagreements persisted. The USDA extended deadlines for HIOs to sign either version of the plan and made concessions on contentious endnotes in response to industry feedback. By July, most HIOs had signed onto either the 2000 or 2000-B plans, though NHSC and Western International continued to resist.

### **Towards a Multi-Year Plan**
In October 2000, NHSC proposed a five-year operating plan modeled on the 1999 version with minor revisions. The USDA responded by scheduling a meeting for November 28 to discuss a multi-year plan for 2001 and beyond. At this meeting, DeHaven acknowledged divergent views among HIOs but expressed optimism about reaching an agreement for a unified operating plan.

By December, the USDA circulated a draft of the 2001-2003 Operating Plan. DeHaven described it as a significant improvement addressing industry concerns without compromising enforcement goals. Early feedback from NHSC representatives suggested cautious optimism about its provisions.

### **2001: Legal Challenges and Final Agreements**
In January 2001, progress was disrupted by a lawsuit from the American Horse Protection Association (AHPA). The AHPA argued that delegating enforcement authority to HIOs violated the HPA. A motion for a temporary restraining order to halt implementation of the new plan was denied, allowing negotiations to continue.

By February, several HIOs, including the Spotted Saddle Horse Breeders’ and Exhibitors’ Association (SSHBEA) and Missouri Fox Trotters, signed the 2001-2003 plan. Meanwhile, legal proceedings continued as both sides filed motions and rebuttals regarding the AHPA’s lawsuit.

Amidst this legal backdrop, congressional representatives from districts with horse shows advocated for clarity and fairness in enforcement plans. Their letters to USDA Secretary Ann Veneman underscored the importance of balancing regulatory oversight with industry needs.

In April 2001, a breakthrough occurred when NHSC chief negotiator Craig Evans signed the 2001-2003 Operating Plan alongside leaders from three other HIOs. A letter of clarification addressed lingering concerns, paving the way for broader acceptance of the plan.

### **Conclusion**
The evolution of the USDA’s Horse Protection Operating Plans underscores the challenges of balancing government oversight with industry cooperation. While each iteration of the plan brought incremental improvements, it also highlighted persistent tensions over enforcement methods and interpretations of regulatory authority. The eventual adoption of the 2001-2003 plan marked a significant step forward, setting a foundation for future multi-year agreements aimed at protecting horses while addressing industry concerns.

This timeline serves as a testament to the complexities of regulatory policy-making in industries where differing priorities must be reconciled for progress to occur.